Knowledge Extraction and Knowledge Integration governed by Łukasiewicz Logics
نویسنده
چکیده
The development of machine learning in particular and artificial intelligent in general has been strongly conditioned by the lack of an appropriate interface layer between deduction, abduction and induction [1]. In this work we extend traditional algebraic specification methods [2] in this direction. Here we assume that such interface for AI emerges from an adequate Neural-Symbolic integration [3]. This integration is made for universe of discourse described on a Topos[4] governed by a many-valued Lukasiewicz logic. Sentences are integrated in a symbolic knowledge base describing the problem domain, codified using a graphicbased language, wherein every logic connective is defined by a neuron in an artificial network. This allows the integration of first-order formulas into a network architecture as background knowledge, and simplifies symbolic rule extraction from trained networks. For the train of such neural networks we changed the Levenderg-Marquardt algorithm [5], restricting the knowledge dissemination in the network structure using soft crystallization. This procedure reduces neural network plasticity without drastically damaging the learning performance, allowing the emergence of symbolic patterns. This makes the descriptive power of produced neural networks similar to the descriptive power of Lukasiewicz logic language, reducing the information lost on translation between symbolic and connectionist structures. We tested this method on the extraction of knowledge from specified structures. For it, we present the notion of fuzzy state automata, and we use automata behaviour to infer its structure. We use this type of automata on the generation of models for relations specified as symbolic background knowledge. Using the involved automata behaviour as data sets, we used our learning methodology, to extract new insights about the models, and inject them into the specification. This allows the improvement about the problem domain knowledge. ———————————————————————–
منابع مشابه
Symbolic Knowledge Extraction using Łukasiewicz Logics
This work describes a methodology that combines logic-based systems and connectionist systems. Our approach uses finite truth-valued Lukasiewicz logic, wherein every connective can be defined by a neuron in an artificial network [1]. This allowed the injection of first-order formulas into a network architecture, and also simplified symbolic rule extraction. For that we trained a neural networks...
متن کاملOn Qualified Cardinality Restrictions in Fuzzy Description Logics under Łukasiewicz semantics
Fuzzy Description Logics have been proposed as a family of languages to describe vague or imprecise structured knowledge. This work deals with one of the less studied constructors, qualified cardinality restrictions, showing some counter-intuitive behaviours under Łukasiewicz semantics, and proposing a new semantics and the corresponding reasoning algorithm.
متن کاملSyntactic Labelled Tableaux for Lukasiewicz Fuzzy ALC
Fuzzy description logics (DLs) serve as a tool to handle vagueness in real-world knowledge. There is particular interest in logics implementing Łukasiewicz semantics, which has a number of favourable properties. Current decision procedures for Łukasiewicz fuzzy DLs work by reduction to exponentially large mixed integer programming problems. Here, we present a decision method that stays closer t...
متن کاملReverse Engineering and Symbolic Knowledge Extraction on Łukasiewicz Fuzzy Logics using Linear Neural Networks
This work describes a methodology to combine logic-based systems and connectionist systems. Our approach uses finite truth valued Lukasiewicz logic, where we take advantage of fact, presented by Castro in [6], what in this type of logics every connective can be define by a neuron in an artificial network having by activation function the identity truncated to zero and one. This allowed the inje...
متن کاملŁukasiewicz Fuzzy EL is Undecidable
Fuzzy Description Logics have been proposed as formalisms for representing and reasoning about imprecise knowledge by introducing intermediate truth degrees. Unfortunately, it has been shown that reasoning in these logics easily becomes undecidable, when infinitely many truth degrees are considered and conjunction is not idempotent. In this paper, we take those results to the extreme, and show ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- CoRR
دوره abs/1604.02780 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2016